For Enterprises & Consortia
Supply-chain provenance, loyalty and rewards, inter-company settlement, B2B invoicing — wherever multiple organizations need a shared, authoritative record with rules they agree on, the per-consortium model fits.
- A network per business relationship. A consortium operates its own chain with its own validator set; member companies are named accounts with their own permission trees. Data is shared among the members, not the world.
- Rules that match the agreement. Settlement terms, access policy, asset definitions, and fee models live in system contracts the consortium owns — not hard-coded by a platform vendor.
- Authorization that mirrors your org chart. Role keys, weighted multisig for approvals, delegation between subsidiaries and parents — your existing authority structure expressed directly.
- Settlement you can reconcile against. Instant, irreversible finality and free reads mean every counterparty (and every auditor) sees the same authoritative state with no confirmation-window ambiguity.
- Interoperate by choice. Networks in the Metal ecosystem share consensus infrastructure and can bridge as the business relationship requires — connection is a decision, never a default exposure.
The same primitives that make this work for banks — named accounts, native permissions, deterministic settlement, owner-defined rules — apply directly to any multi-party enterprise process.